5 THINGS I HATE ABOUT TTIP

Dear TTIP,

5 things I hate about you.

1 I hate you because you are anti democratic, you want to take decisions away from elected politicians with all their flaws and have decisions made by unelected folk in the World Trade Organisation and the World Bank, ECB and so on become binding. You want decisions about our lives taken in the boardrooms and not the parliaments.

2 I hate you because you are dodgy deal done in secret, you dont want the general public to know about you.You dont allow submissions or evidence from trade unions or community groups or professional bodies like the bma.

3 I hate you because you wreck jobs and drive wages and conditions down.According to the german institute of economic research The evidence show that there is an initial loss of jobs when trade agreements like TTIP come into effect and then later the jobs come back with lower wages and poorer conditions of employment. TTIP is expected to eventually create or recreate 180,000 jobs across the whole of EU.There are currently 41.5 million jobs in Germany alone

4 I hate you because you are going to bring in weaker regulatory authorities in the American style and we all know UK industries which need to have weaker regulations like electricity companies or big banks

5 And finally TTIP I hate you because of Philip Morris. BigPhil isnt a man, he’s a multinational tobacco company and his asian arm ( I told you he was big) is suing Australia under their version of TTIP for billions of pounds because the Australian govt brought in a law that cigarettes must be sold in pain packs. Big Phil said this destroyed his trademarks, his intellectual property and is suing the Australian govt for billiions in the International Court of Arbitration. Australia is also defending itself in 3 other countries Honduras,Dominican Republic and Ukraine and in a case brought against it by the World Trade Organisation. The world trade organisation defending big tobaccos right to influence a country’s health policy.

Thank you but no thanks,

Poverty Porn

If you went down to the woods in North Ballachulish last weekend you were in for a very big surprise all the way from Ghana, The Kakatsitsi drummers The Solidarity Croft Party was a bright beacon at the end of a long dark week. Over the weekend party goers filled two bulk bags filled with donations for foodbanks in Lochaber an Glasgow. On the subject of foodbanks I read a tweet the other day criticising the  folk at post18/9 Yes events for donating to feed banks”so you fed a few junkies, well done” The only junkie I knew was found dead in his flat ,oded on his first fix after a day or two without heroin. Police found Bob as he didnt show up for court ,he had attempted to break in to a chemist shop a few weeks earlier.all this made it into the local paper.Bob died a junkie and a criminal. .Bob was a Royal Marine he served in the first Gulf War and in tthe Balkans. Bob was a farmer, and a builder. Bob was a son, a brother and to a fortunate few , he was an honest and trusted friend. None of that made  the paper. This made me wonder , how is it that some people become a lesser class of humans in the eyes of others. Why would junkies deserve to go hungry? Why is their crime worse for example than other thieves?  Why are those on benefits “scroungers” There is a campaign going on to vilify the poor . In a survey Michael Meacher found that many people believe 27% of benefits are fraudulent claims. Govt stats say only 0.7% is fraudulently claimed. Work gets people out of poverty they say well yeah, if you get paid a living wage. Meacher found hundreds of thousands of people in work need to claim benfits just to get by. We  tax payers are effectively subsidising those employers  who do not pay  their lowest paid workers enough to live on. If the min wage had risen as fast as pay for chief execs over the last 10 years it would now be £19 per hour. There is no trickle down effect. Sourcehttp://www.michaelmeacher.info/weblog/2013/03/how-can-they-justify-persecuting-the-poor/  The current ethos seems to be that those who have the most, the economic might are right ,and this rightness slithers away as you get nearer the lower end of the social scale till you get to the least fortunate of all, the immigrants, the disabled,the jobless,homeless weakest of us all. We shit on them,with bedroom taxes, and benefit caps,and sanctions if they find a little cash in hand work once or twice. We shit on them with fit for work medicals and front page lies in the Daily Fail. Well it doesn’t have to be like that, it wasn’t always thus, and believe me, it does not have to be like this. I would not be proud to live in a country where vulnerable people can get a meal without using a foodbank. It would give me no cause for pride at all to look after those in need with sensitivity and without  passing judgement is not a mark of excellence it’s the bare minimum. There is an obvious,urgent need to overhaul the benefits system in the UK,but that alone is not enough, currently UK society is dominated by a view that” the market” knows best. This model is applied in every area of society, business,leisure and culture, sport, health and social policy,  safety at work.  To make a real difference to the world we as a nation need to agree that “the market is not king” or if you prefer “I’m not alright Jack.

Well it doesn’t have to be like that, it wasn’t always thus, and believe me, it does not have to be like this. We don’t need  an airforce to change this,nor backing from big business.Ghandi and Mandela would be welcome but,  they’re both gone and we can do fine ourselves.  Superman for f #### sake put your trousers on after your pants, and tuck your cape in, its Clark Kent we need. After ww2 Clement Attlee’s government brought in sweeping and courageous social reforms, the NHS under Aneurin Bevan and the ” Cradle to Grave” Welfare State as designed by William Beveridge. Attlee was a great prime minister, not because of charisma or fiery speeches but because he was pragmatic, diligent and a team player believed passionately that he should seek to benefit the whole of society collectively.  The Labour Party was something to be proud of then.

Last weekend at  The Solidarity Croft Party (https://www.facebook.com/events/626150497503358/?fref=ts) a  diverse crowd of folk  showed up, showed wiling, showed solidarity and in their own small way made the world a bit of a better place, by thinking and acting collectively ,to benefit the whole. Sure the few did a lot of work, to make the party happen so that the many could give a little to those in need.

We did this with laughter, with chat,with song ,and lots  of dancing ( not much falling down ) spirits were raised (and sunk) and raised again.

Aye Solidarity, Community,Collective, there’s something to be proud of right enough!

Many thanks to Griogair, all the bands, and all who helped make it such a memorable weekend.

Moran taing,

Shapes of Things to Come

http://www.deezer.com/track/10781147 The road to Bled by Shooglenifty

The last few days I have read and heard some fairly harrowing reactions to the referendum result. People have been mulling over the make up of their country and many are questioning their own identity . This guy expresses his feelings better than I ever will.

I’ve been struggling to get my thoughts in order since Friday morning. A wee break up north gave me some thinking time and has, I hope, let me put some perspective on things. I thought that writing some stuff down might also help. That link to bellacaledonia probably most captures my overall mood though.

First of all, let me say how angry I am. Not at those who voted No, more at myself. All my life I’ve believed that Scotland was a nation, a country in some sort of “reluctant” union with England. Folk talk of “national” anthems, of the “national” press. We have sports teams, leagues and competitions because we are a separate country. We have a separate legislature, education system and now a form of devolved government. We have a strong culture of song, story and poetry made richer by a frequent focus on Scottish nationhood. I guess I had allowed myself a semantic misunderstanding, that folk who talked of a separate Scottish nation actually meant it the same way that I did.

In the run up to the referendum, I had also fallen into a social media trap. I’m sure we’ve all done it to an extent. We “like” or “follow” the commentators, groups and feeds that back up our view of the world. Thus, with 18th September approaching, it was all too easy to read all the messages of confirmation and to believe that we really were capable of re-establishing nationhood. TBH, for me that probably didn’t even have to result in too much change. A choice by the people of Scotland to assert their sovereignty could well have resulted in almost exactly the sort of union we currently have. The difference is that we would at least know it was of our choosing and that we could exit it without permission from some higher authority. This is, after all, the sort of union that already exists across the EU.

I do believe that the media played a major part in the result. I saw too much stuff first hand that was somehow downplayed or simply lied about to believe it was all unintentional. Of course, newspapers and independent sources don’t have to maintain balance but I really had expected better of the BBC. I guess I will never trust any of their reporting again.

I never really believed that 50%+1 was sufficient either. Even 55/45 the other way seems too close as a result. Looking at independence movements in other countries, I’d have hoped for something more like 80/20. And now we are left with “the 45”. I’m still getting all the pro-indy comments, how we can do it again in 2020, or devise some other method for upsetting Westminster.

Currently, this looks to me like the actions of a spoilt child that hasn’t got what it asked for and is now just shouting louder in the vain hope that the decision can be overturned. Whether what we now have is the “settled” will of the people, I cannot say but I’m certainly not in favour of re-running these past two years every decade or so.

At the moment, I’m going through my facebook and twitter feeds and removing what I can and I’m going to try to open my mind a bit more to what other folk are saying, to listen to their spin on what Scotland is.

Until then, the best I can describe my feelings is to say that I feel like a person displaced. Like the country I thought I belonged to has been obliterated and no amount of lashing out at others will change that.”

“The country I thought I belonged to has been obliterated” There you have it, Friday morning condensed into ten words. However Friday morning passed and while that might have been how I felt at the time that passed too. Scotland is not the place I thought it was but it is still the place I love,with all its many contradictions still my home, and its people, for a they might have voted no, are still  my ain folk.

This comment on the same forum from a guy who voted no also opened my eyes.

Athgray

“Scotroutes post eloquently puts national sentiment and identity to the fore. Everyone has a different view on nationhood, one no more valid than another. We can question what vote is best for Scotland, but everyone that put a cross on the ballot paper did so in the best interest of THEIR Scotland! You cannot ask for much more.

Since the result I have been going through a range of emotions. Initial relief, then guilt, sometimes happy this period is over as I feel drained, and sad at other times that the anticipation has gone. I know how I would have felt if the vote had gone the other way, and I have family and friends that are completely gutted right now.

I must also apologize for any offence I caused to members throughout the debate. I took many posts and links to heart and was often unpleasant in response. Although many have contributed in support of UK, I felt like it’s sole supporter here with a vote, although that is no excuse. I tried not to read the papers and saw more Yes social media. I never felt Better Together grasped the way I feel, with only Gordon Brown coming close on the eve of the referendum.

I felt able to make some closure after making a peaceful protest by turning my back to Alex Salmond when he visited my home town recently. I know the gesture was symbolic but I felt compelled to make it. Following this my picture was put on social media, where some comments from Yes supporters were positive and supportive.

That day I got a sense of, and an admiration of the community and unity of purpose that is Yes Scotland, and felt occasional jealousy that no similar group could convey this in support of the UK.

I initially believed there would be no winners from the referendum whatever the result. Scotroutes comments make me think this belief may not be true.”

Theres no sense of celebration or triumph in that just relief, honesty and some admiration for the Yes campaigners. I have had some verbally bruising encounters with Ath and it took guts for him to apologise,for that he has my respect.

I suppose what I have to say now will disappoint him though. Now we must unite and try to make a better Scotland ,independence is not on the agenda but in time, I don’t know when, it will be.

So how do we keep the energy and drive, the “community and unity of purpose” that Athgray spoke about. Whatever we do we must look at our campaign critically, learn from those mistakes or we’ll repeat them.We have to be prepared to listen to at least some of those who opposed us their aims may not be that different from ours. I think we also have to be able to work on local and national levels. The political parties that backed Yes are all growing at an astonishing rate,they are well suited to work at a national level but less so for working at a local level as they are centralised organisations. I liked the ground up rather than top down community nature of yes and that is holding me back from (re)joining the SNP. The last few days has seen new websites,Facebook pages ,spin off organisations popping up all over the place. Keeping track of it is like trying to herd cats.

It is the nature of grass roots ,community based campaigns the very space that allows each group to develop its own distinctive identity,gives groups the freedom to act with independence (nice word that let’s say it again, ready … INDEPENDENCE) The problem is that very space and freedom , flying by the seat of your pants style can lead to uncoordinated campaigns,and all these different  groups doing different things can look like a split in the campaign, you know how the media love a split.

So signing off I still dont know which organisation to join. I would like a local group under a national umbrella. That sounds like Yes Lochaber/ Yes Scotland to me.

Lhttp://bellacaledonia.org.uk/2014/09/19/we-tried-our-best/